The Am Law Daily
  • Home
  • The Am Law Daily
  • Litigation Daily
  • Asian Lawyer
  • Surveys & Rankings
  • Magazine
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > The Am Law 100, the Early Numbers: Saul Ewing Revenue Up 7.8 Percent, PPP Up 12 Percent

Font Size: increase font decrease font

The Am Law 100, the Early Numbers: Saul Ewing Revenue Up 7.8 Percent, PPP Up 12 Percent

By Zack Needles Contact All Articles 

The Legal Intelligencer

January 31, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Following a 2011 fiscal year in which its revenue stayed nearly flat, Saul Ewing saw its 2012 revenue shoot up 7.8 percent despite only a modest increase in headcount.

Managing partner David S. Antzis attributed this financial growth spurt to a "strategic vision" focused on improving client service and increasing market share, which enabled the firm to snag some significant work from the jaws of its larger competition.

The firm's revenue increased from $122.5 million in 2011 to $132 million in 2012.

Meanwhile, its overall headcount increased by only 3.2 percent, from 219 lawyers to 226, but its revenue per lawyer (RPL) increased by 4.5 percent, from $560,000 to $585,000.

In addition, the firm's profits per partner (PPP) went up 12 percent, from $500,000 to $560,000, while its equity partner tier decreased by only two lawyers, from 83 to 81.

Antzis said that while a lot of large firms increase their revenue each year by adding more attorneys without increasing their profitability, Saul Ewing's revenue increased in 2012 simply because its existing lawyers brought in more business.

According to Antzis, the firm was involved in several significant matters on both the litigation and transactional sides.

For example, the firm's Baltimore litigation team won a favorable ruling for the city's police and firefighter unions when a Maryland federal judge struck down the mayor's plan to overhaul the police and fire pension system.

On the transactional side, Saul Ewing attorneys in Boston represented real estate client KS Partners in its $65 million purchase of New Boston Fund Inc.'s office portfolio in Connecticut.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Dionne & Gass
  • K&L Gates
  • Ropes & Gray
  • Saul Ewing
  • Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Riocan
  • Boston firm Ropes & Gray
  • Supernus Pharmaceuticals
  • Maryland Public Service Commission
  • New Boston Fund
  • KS Partners
  • PSC
  • Penn University
  • Constellation Energy Group Inc.
  • Exelon Corporation

Key categories

    
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Law Firm Office and Business Structure Changes

Most viewed stories

    
  1. The Am Law 200's Haves and Have-Nots
    •      
  2. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  3. New Orrick Leader Adds to Team with CMO from Shearman
    •      
  4. DOJ Bankruptcy Watchdog Unleashes Tough New Fee Rules
    •      
  5. Jun He Decides There's No Place Like Home
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About The American Lawyer | Contact The American Lawyer | Advertise with Us | Site Map

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media